• Follow Me On Twitter

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

My conversation with MeganLeeHeart

MeganLeeHeart's First message to me from her gaming channel

This is the first half of her long message to me, I will embed the videos below

This is the second half of her message

So then I replied

Well this is my reply to MeganLeeHeart

So this is her pretty much telling me that she will not leave her alone

I respond

My reply was based on two twitter messages sent to me from her boyfriend

LifeInATent's tweet about reporting me to Machinima

LifeInATent tries to pretend that MeganLeeHeart is in a different network

LifeInATent deleted this tweet but someone grabbed it just in time

This was the final message she sent me before I blocked her.

Well as I have already documented she is not copying your videos.  Both of you simply did a video on a news story and MeganLeeHeart simply uploaded hers first.  MeganLeeHeart is not the only source of news on the internet.  There is of course Google News and when all else fails there is always television.  If MeganLeeHeart truly believes that people are going to her channel for the news of the day, well I got some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell her.

This is not just some petty fight that sprang up out of nowhere.  In fact this is not a fight.  A fight involves two parties.  A fight does not even require two consenting parties.  One can simply be the aggressor and the other can be defending themselves.  This is not a fight.  This is one lady who has been harassed on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook for several months now.  Despite her repeated requests to be left alone they have not done so.  Her only crime, she sometimes gets more views than MeganLeeHeart and therefore must be destroyed.

Now here is where it gets funny.  MeganLeeHeart apparently is afraid for her life because of  TheReplyGirl

Forward to 4:35 seconds into the video for that screen shot.

MeganLeeHeart there is a reason you have the reputation you do on YouTube.  You have the reputation you do because of your behavior both past and present.   You and your boyfriend attack anyone who dares to speak out and criticise you.  You first threaten them with physical violence and when that doesn’t work you threaten to report them to YouTube.  How is that working out for you two?

http://www.youtube.com/blondievlogs

http://www.youtube.com/skitsnvlogs

and of course the Ultimate Lolcow of them all

http://www.youtube.com/lifeinatent

For someone who claims to have direct access with youtube and the ability to shut down anyone’s channel via a phone call, why is it that your past channels have not been restored?

What MeganLeeHeart Considers Harassment LOL

Below is part of a very long message from MeganLeeHeart.  I will make the full message available in another post but I just wanted to highlight the relevant text here.

[Note I have copied and pasted it exactly as it was typed,  the spelling errors are hers.]

My deal with the one you are defending was kept on facebook which is a private issue. She copied two video topics. She does video reviews okay fine but two times I did a vlog about topics that have no videos and she turns around and copies me. That is no acceptable and that is why I do not like her and never will. Nothing will change my mind and if I want to continue telling her to stop doing my personal topics I have a right to do so.

here are examples of latest in the links below

I never said there was a video, it was my MeganSpeaks show which I speak about things that are on my mind and all the sudden it is copied an hour later. I do not appreciate it at all and I will not sit here and watch her copy my topics especially if it wasn’t a viral review. That to me is harassment. If she doesn’t leave my topics alone, then it will get worse. I will continue to tell her to stop and there is not a thing you can do.

Now as anyone can clearly see, this is not copying a personal vlog.  This is simply two ladies doing videos on the news.  It just so happens that MeganLeeHeart got to the camera first.  If MeganLeeHeart did a vlog about what she did at the mall and what kind of shoes she bought, and TheReplyGirl copied that then I could see an issue.  However this is NOT a personal vlog.  It is two ladies reporting on the news.

Constructive Criticism for AngryAussie

This is a blog response to AngryAussie’s blog post which you can read here

http://angryaussie.wordpress.com/2010/05/30/why-i-dont-give-a-fuck-about-male-circumcision-zealots/

Now AngryAussie has been a good friend of mine and it does pain me to write this.  I am hoping that he will listen to these words of constructive criticism.  I have been a subscriber of his since 2007 and back in the summer of 2008 he did subscribe to me.  That made my day.  He has been very kind and always willing to lend a helping hand to smaller youtube channels and has organized many YouTube gatherings in Australia.

However one minor complaint that I have had of him is his lack of tolerance for those who criticize his views.  A few months back he addressed why he does this.

Now, I am quite aware that Mr Angry is just his internet persona, and that it is just an act.  However there are times such as his recent rant on circumcision that I believe he is being serious.  I believe that he is really trying to convince people of his way of thinking.  If that is the case then, I would advise him that he does this, he should be ready to withstand criticism.

I have made many videos where I try to convince others that I am right on an issue.  I know, I always know that there is going to be someone who is going to call bullshit on me if I get something wrong.  All of my claims must be based on fact and not opinion.  The internet has no tolerance for those who can’t back up their claims with evidence.

Now AngryAussie has every right to censor the comments on his youtube channel and on his blog posting here on this site.  However doing this tells me three things.

  1. He is not willing to learn new information, therefore he has chosen to be willfully ignorant
  2. He is not willing to back up his claims with evidence
  3. He is not willing to admit that his previous claims have been debunked.

Now lets get into the meat of the matter.

AngryAussie believes that female circumcision is wrong and barbaric.  He is correct.

However his belief that those who oppose male circumcision are somehow doing so because they feel they have been forever emotionally traumatized is a flawed argument.  I would like to quote from his blog that he posted back in 2006 which can bee seen here

http://angryaussie.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/not-without-my-foreskin/

It strikes me as absurd and perhaps more than a little sick, that in a world so full of problems and injustice, some men can treat the fact they were circumcised as one of the biggest travesties of modern life

While that may be true for some who oppose circumcision it certainly is not true for all, and to say otherwise is demonstrably not true.  For example, Dr Dean Edell, a nationally syndicated medical talk show host has been a frequent critic of circumcision for both male and female and he does so on sound research that can be backed up.

People like myself who speak out on male circumcision do so, not because we lament the loss of our foreskin, but because we see it as a needless medical procedure that is very painful for the child and can hinder his sexual performance.  We speak out on male circumcision simply to prevent future babies from being circumcised.  Nothing more.

In that same blog post from 2006 AngryAussie wrote:

I’m sure these foreskin evangelists will say that I, as a circumcised male who doesn’t give a shit, am in denial. But excuse me if there’s a few injustices I want to sort out before I bother with “the crime of circumcision”.

To that I would simply reply, why then do you speak out against female circumcision.  Certainly there are more problems in the world that need greater attention than female circumcision.   To name a few, we have economy that needs to be rebuilt.  We are in a war and currently fight to maintain occupation of two countries.  Slavery is still being practiced in a few places in Africa.  We have global warming, and the BP oil disaster that not only will scar the ocean life in that region but will cause oil prices to sky rocket.

So simply because there are more pressing matters to address than female circumcision, does that mean we should remain silent?  No.  We can speak out against global warming, we can press our nations leaders for tighter controls over oil drilling.  We can speak out against the war or in favor of it, and we can even make time for female circumcision.

So why not speak out against all circumcision?  Why only condemn female circumcision?  I have yet to get an answer to this.  AngryAussie why won’t you condemn male circumcision?  It is a simple question.

Previously you have said this, in your blog post from 2006

I will go on record as saying circumcision is unnecessary. I don’t think anyone’s built a compelling case for a medical need or even significant benefit for circumcision

So you obviously believe that it is a needless procedure.  However, do you believe that it is wrong and that it should be criminalized?  Yes or no.

You state the following for condemning female circumcision in your most recent blog post here

http://angryaussie.wordpress.com/2010/05/30/why-i-dont-give-a-fuck-about-male-circumcision-zealots/

To say that male circumcision is the same as female genital mutilation is unsupportable both logically and morally. Male circumcision removes the foreskin either for cultural or health reasons (you’re free to say this is pointless – I really don’t give a fuck about arguing the point). The point of circumcision is NOT to impair the function of the penis or the male enjoyment of sex. In the rare cases when something goes wrong with a circumcision and there is some damage that was NEVER the INTENTION of the procedure.

Female genital mutilation is specifically designed to damage the sexuality and sexual enjoyment of women for religious and/or cultural reasons. It is a premeditated violent act that frequently causes long term physical trauma and pain for the girls and women it is performed on. It is specifically about repressing and punishing women simply because they are women.

The two act are not the same in either effect or intention. To claim male circumcision is “just as bad” is quite frankly disgusting and reprehensible. The level of self-absorption required to make such a statement stuns me.

What baffles me is this clearly contradicts his blog post from 2006 in which he said this:

Dr John Harvey Kellog (yes, the cornflakes inventor) proclaimed: “The remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision.” Yeah, nice one Dr K. I’m circumcised and, not that I’m of the opinion that masturbation needs to be “cured”, I can safely assure the good doctor that he was off the mark with that idea.

So AngryAussie is well aware of the medical history that some doctors promoted circumcision as a way to reduce sexual pleasure.  Even as early as the 12 century it was believed that circumcision could reduce sexual pleasure in males.

http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/

Now to those who would discredit such evidence because it comes from an anti-circumcision website need to do one thing.  Prove that Moses Maimonides, the author cited, never said the things in that article.  Before you can discredit that link, you must prove that it is a forgery.  You will also need to provide evidence of the forgery.  Now, we can certainly debate on the merits of that article, after all it was based on 12 century knowledge of biology.  However, it can not be denied that even as early as the 12 century there were those who promoted circumcision to reduce sexual pleasure.

When circumcision was promoted here in western cultures in the 19th century it was done so for similar reasons.  Medical knowledge was lacking and even AngryAussie admitted in 2006 that some promoted it as a cure for masterbation.  Here is a link to some quotes from medical professionals of that era.

http://www.noharmm.org/docswords.htm

Like before, in order to discredit that link because it is a anti-circumcision website you must document that the quotes listed are either in error, or misrepresentations of what was actually said.

Furthermore to say that people do not circumcise girls for medical reasons is simply not true.  There are those who try to justify this practice on scientific principals.  Here is one such example

According to a book by David Gollaher, Circumcison: A history of the world’s most controversial surgery, proponents of female circumcision cite  reduced sexual desire, lower risk of vaginal cancer and AIDS, less nervous anxiety, fewer infections “from microbes gathering under the hood of the clitoris” and protection against herpes and genital ulcers as health benefits.  Now these guys are completely Froot Loops, but this is how they justify it.

Likewise most pediatric associations in the world today no longer recommend circumcision.  As far as the health risks such as penile cancer or urinary tract disease, men are far more likely to suffer from breast cancer.  Futhermore, why should we surgically remove part of our body on the mere chance that it might get sick.  We all age, and with age comes health problems.

As far as the risk of aids, the problem with that study is that many in Africa, where that study was conducted either did not use condoms for religious beliefs or simply did not always have access to them.  The control group for that study was far from adequate.  The best way to reduce the risk of Aids and other STD’s is to use a condom and practice a monogamous or celebate lifestyle.

AngryAussie has been told this over and over and over.  The fact is he simply keeps deleting comments and blocking people.  He can not claim ignorance of this information.  He is more than welcome to dispute the evidence, but so far has not done so.  So far every answer to people trying to educate him has been to shout them down.

I have tried my best to find some comments in his youtube video but most of them he has deleted.  I have however saved some of his comment replies to his blog post.  Remember in each time the person commenting was not emotional non-sense but was respectfully giving their feedback based on scientific evidence

AngryAussie if you don’t want people disagreeing with you in your blogs and videos, then DISABLE THE FUCKING COMMENTS!!!!  Do not enable comments and then get upset when people ask you to back up your claims.

The main point of this essay is to ask one simple question.  AngryAussie if you get this upset when people challenge your view points, why express them?  If you truly want to change people’s mind, you must be willing to admit when you are wrong and be open to new ideas as they come along.

We got him, but not quite

Update his new channel is http://www.youtube.com/pookah666

Greetings, I am the HappyCabbie

We got him.  On June 8, 2009 alleged YouTube pedophile Wally0666 was suspended from YouTube.  A major credit for this goes to ooolong9 whose video was mirrored around until enough of us saw it and reported this person to YouTube.  A message I received back from YouTube was, thanks we have forwarded this to our abuse team.

So Wallo777 has been suspended.  What do we do now?  First and foremost, some housecleaning is in order, follwed by some education.  First a big thanks to Pervbegone, ProjectPaladin, dprjones, and countless others.  A special shout out goes to Breahawk who by far made the most useful and informative video on this subject.  Many of you put your own channels at risk for exposing this monster.  Sadly YouTube has a reputation for suspending the wrong person when evil needs to be exposed.

In order to convince everyone that there was a problem, you had to show us what he did.  This included reposting clips of the videos made by these very young girls.  For thos who still do not know, Wallyo777 contacted dozens of underage girls.  He requested that they show their feet.  Some where asked to stomp on toys barefoot.  Some others were asked to wiggle their toes, while some wrote on their feet.  Some even were asked to do even more bizzare things.

The children were innocent and there was NO fetish or sexual themes in their videos.  However, they were received as fetish videos by Wallyo777.  The children did not understand the true nature of these videos, they probably still do not.

Thankfully many of the girls, some as young as 7 years old have deleted these videos.  Some are still up but that is because the kids have not logged back in yet.  Wallyo777 has been exposed and suspended.  No doubt the police are working with YouTube to get his ISP.  Wallo777 if you are watching this, I hope you will be broom sticked in prision you fucking piece of shit.  The law is comming for you and I hope for your own safety they find you before us YouTubers do.

Back on Topic.  You all did a great thing in bringing down this user.  However, I would respectively request that you either delete or at least set to private any videos you made that contain the images of these young girls.  These girls are the most innocent of victims here.  It is now time for them to rebuild, regroup, and recover.  They need to be with their familes and counselors.  The last thing they need is this memory forever preserved on YouTube.  Again you HAD to post the videos on YouTube to expose this monster.  He is suspended and the law will find him.

Now on to education.  Pedophiles rarely walk onto a playground and grab children and start raping them.  Rather, most victims of molestation know and trusted their predator.  This is why YouTube has such a strict policy of no kids under 13 years old.  If you are under 13 and YouTube catches you, they will suspend your account.  If you are under 18, YouTube requires that you have your parental consent.  If you are a child, or even a teenager watching this, please understand that I am not trying to be mean.  Howver, you are NOT qualifed to determine who is and who is not to be trusted on the internet.  You lack the experience that can only come with age.

If you are a parent, demand that your child provide you with all emails and passwords to the websites they visit.  They can have a computer in their room but the only access to internet they should have is at a family computer in the living room.  That way you can moniter them while they are online.  If your child refuses, cancel the internet.  Moniter your kids online.

This is why I do not subscribe to children on YouTube.  I limit my email correspondance unless I really know the age of the person I am talking to.  Children do NOT contact any adult on the internet.  It is just not safe.

I suggest you look at Wikipedia’s article on Child Grooming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_grooming Fun fact the author of the US child grooming law was Senator Mark Foley who was forced to resign due to sexual emails he sent to underage interns.

In closing, there are some of you who think, we are over-reacting or trying to be a thought police.  Some do not see the harm as these videos the kids made were not intended to be used for masterbation.  (At least in the kids mind)  The problem is there were dozens of videos made for this guy.  All were by young girls all featuring their bare feet.  These were made at the request of someone with a foot fetish.  I recognize this because I myself am attracted to womens feet.  I just prefer my ladies to be old enough to vote.

Search for pookah666 videos now if you think I am making this shit up http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=pookah666&aq=f

Strong Advice to DarylHorner and others who get flagged

I saw DarylHorner’s video titled “I’m Baaaaaaack” and I am very happy for him.  However, there was something he said in his video.  At 1:55 into the video DarylHorner stated that from now on no video of his will ever be posted to YouTube without first being approved for ads.  For those who do not know, YouTube Partners much submit each video individually for revenue sharring.  For videos that YouTube feels, at it’s own discretion, violate community standards they will not approve them for ads and they will disable the video.  Long time viewers may remember I had trouble learning this when I first became partner

Since that time I have learned that to get a video approved the title must be bland, and nothing to graphic in the video description.  Even my video (now deleted) of me doing a balloon penis was approved using this technique.  The video is still available on DropVids if anyone wants to see it.

However my word of caution to DarylHorner and to any other Partner on YouTube is do not assume that having YouTube approve your video for ads is a blanket protection against flagging.  Many partners have had videos removed or age restricted after they were approved for ads.

Even videos done a long time ago can get you into trouble

What is amazing is TJ claims to have no idea why a video titled “Fuck Buddism” would be considered offensive.

So my advice to anyone who wants to stay on YouTube and not have their channel suspended is to be careful.  Anything can get you flagged these days.  Now while I admit, there is a double standard.  Some people are allowed to use boob thumbnails and get away with it.  Others can use profanity while others cannot.  However this much is clear.

1.  Watch the language

2.  Watch the sexual content

3. Find another place to discuss religion, YouTube does not want it here.

4.  Do not use misleading titles, tags, or video descriptions.

5.  Do not make a video attacking someone else, even if they attack you.

I know we can all cite countless of examples of those who get away with the afore mentioned behavior.  We can cite examples of how YouTube will even put these people on the front page time and time again.  It is called a double standard, we may not like it, but we must play by the rules of the court if we wish to remain here and not find ourselves suspended.

Is Flagging Wrong?

There has been alot of talk on YouTube recently about flagged videos and each time it happens the person who got flagged makes a video about it usually followed up by videos by their fans who blame youtube for flagging a video.  Such recent examples are IshatOnU, ShaneDawsonTV, ClipCritics, and probably even many more.  I myself question the logic of a website that allows Playboy, Maxim, and other channels based exclusively on sex.  I mean Playboy is a porno rag isn’t it?

So why does YouTube allow these videos if they do not want sexually suggestive videos on YouTube?  Surely YouTube knew who Playboy and Maxim where when they signed the contract with them.

So why then is a different standard held for Clip Critics who featured Maxim Model, Paola Corvea in their video.  http://www.vimeo.com/4634806

 

Now I agree, and I am sorry to say this ClipCritics, but your video did cross the line.  However why is Maxim and Playboy even allowed to have a channel here.  My problem is not with the rules and boundries but with the double standard the rules are applied with.

The next question goes out about cursing.  Now the following two videos were flagged for cursing.    The first one done by good friend IshatOnU actually was able to appeal and have his video unflagged.  It is not an easy process but it can be done.

The second one, sadly was taken down and the only copy I can find is a remix parody.  The context of the video was Renetto talking about why the blackout would not work and a better way of dealing with YouTube censorship was to have a curse out.  The video was flagged and removed.

However the original file can be found here on Vloggerheadshttp://www.vloggerheads.com/video/2225835:Video:511436 

However, YouTube clearly is not against cursing.  If you live in the United States then you know one of the most featured users is TheAmazingAtheist.  (Featured Videos used to be called Promoted Videos.  The old Featured Videos are now called Spotlight Videos.  Who gives a sweet muffins.)  YouTube places him on the front page all the time.  So even though they said in their blog post “A YouTube for All of Us,” that they did not want cursing anymore. clearly they still allow it to show up on the most viewed and most discussed lists.  However, in the cases stated above, the only possible reason for them to be flagged is the cursing.  Clearly someone who is viewed often as TheAmazingAtheist has been flagged a few times.  Again, I have no problem with cursing, I just wish there was not a double standard.  However, the best way to avoid getting flagged for cursing is to not curse.

Now comes the shocking and disgusting content.  These videos were flagged and some have been removed but are now restored.  First up is ShaneDawsonTV who was flagged for having a girl pretend to vomit on his face.  Now the vomit looks like cottage cheese but still when YouTube reviewed the video they took it down.  He was able to appeal the decision and have the video restored.  Do you agree or disagree.

Ok now what about this video.  So far this has not been age restricted or removed but it seems highly unlikely that nobody has flagged this video.  In this video CharlesTrippy pretends to fart in someone’s drink and accidently poops instead.  His friend brings the cup into his mouth before he is aware of the poop.  Now I am not trying to hate on either ShaneDawson or CharlesTrippy but if a smaller channel had someone drink poop, or vomit on someone’s face but I know that if a smaller channel did that they would be suspended permanantly.  

Now the GradualReport, who I am also subscribed to was recently given a 2 week suspension for violating community guidelines.  I actually have a lot of respect for him.  Instead of posting a video saying he was flagged for no reason or that YouTube was wrong to suspend him, he fully admits to what he did.  Here is his video.

Now there are several examples of videos that were flagged and are now age restricted such as this vile example of a video featuring a tribute to Jim Henson.  Can anyone for the love of sweet muffins explain to me what in this video is innapropriate for children?

Then there is this video that is still up no matter how many times I flag it.  Then there are countless examples of videos that were taken down and nobody knows why.  However for the majority, there is a reason why a video was age restricted or removed.  There is always a reason, it is just not always clear to us what that reason is.  This is a copy of an email forwarded to me by someone who had a video removed by YouTube and as a result was suspended.

bannedt

Now what is so sad is that in this form email they send you when you ask them why you were suspended they tell you, they cannot explain what rule you broke.  All they do is say you broke the rules, you may never come back, but if you want to find out for yourself what you did wrong they provide you a link to their community guidelines which is at their website they just banned you from.  Now I am very pro-YouTube in my views and I take a lot of heat for this, however this is one thing I wish they would change.  They need to explain to you what rule you broke so that others may learn from your mistakes so that they too may not be banned.  Furthermore, with the exception of sexual predators and those that stir up drama, I see no point in a permanant life time ban.  Especially when they are unwilling to justify the lifetime suspension.  

However these are the rules of the website and if we want to continue to use it, we need to play by their rules.  So I ask you, if you are reading this to please watch the language, not post disgusting content, or other controversial videos on YouTube.  I don’t want to see any more of my friends being banned.

For my more raunchy videos that are too hot for YouTube they will be onhttp://www.dropvids.com/users/happycabbie 

Seeking Meaningful Employment as an Ebegger

Now VenomfangX lost his last job for using company owned  DVD burners to make copies of Kent Hovind DVDs and passing them out to customers of the video store that he worked at.  He says he feels this is religious persecution.  Sadly he has no idea what true religious persecution is.  In some countries you are killed for speaking out about Christianity.  In the Western world we have it pretty good.

His idea is to go into the ministry full time as an evangelist both here on YouTube and on his website and have his subscribers send in $1.00 per month to support him.  All he is asking for is $500 per month and any surplus money would be given to charities such as sick kids hospitals.  In my opinion it is shameful to exploit sick children to guilt people into donating to your cause as their are many childrens hospitals such as the Shriners or the Phoenix Children’s hosptial where I live that goes out of their way to make the lives of children better as they treat them.

However because VenomfangX is famous for deleting his videos if that video one day no longer plays here are some copies.

So what is wrong with supporting someone who wants to go into the ministry full time.    After all there are many who make a living from spreading the gospel.  Now I am not referring to the scam artist like faith healers, but rather actual pastors, priests, or what ever the spiritual leader of your house of worship is called.  These people work long hours more than just an hour on Sunday.  These people are on call 24/7 as they must be available for grief counseling when ever someone passes away or is going through a divorce.  They must be financial leaders as they are ultimately accountable for how the money is spent even though most church finances are governed by a board of trustees.  

As a former active participant in Christianity let me say that not only have I labored hard to spread the message of Christ but also I have spent long hours volunteering at church activities caring for its disadvantaged members.  (Note:  I do not wish to discuss why I left church.  So please do not ask.)  I have volunteered at church run meal kitchens, clothing pantries, bus ministry, and I have spent countless hours evangelizing door to door.  I have passed out church literature, and have purchased cd’s and even VHS tapes to give away.

So what is the difference between a pastor, or a missionary that works for a church and what VenomfangX is asking his supporters to do.  The primary difference is a pastor or missionary is accountable to a board of decons or some other governmental body within the church.  A pastor who falls into sin, or for whatever reason fails to live up to his or her responsibilites for the cause of Christ can be removed and replaced by the board of decons.  In most churches the pastor held accountable for his behavior and the results he or she produces.

Furthermore at least in the United States (Yes I know he lives in Canada) one of the requirements of 501c3 organizations such as churches is their finances must be accounted for.  There must be a budget.  Many churches produce an annual report publically disclosing their income and expenses.  At the very least this annual report is made available to the board of trustees.  This is to prevent wasteful spending by the trustees of that organization.  If VenomfangX wishes to become a full time missionary I suggest he attend seminary and find employment through a church to which he can be held accountable.  

Here is an interesting video response from an actual preacher.

In my own defense I did ebegging myself.  At the time however I was living in my car while I was working full time as a failing balloon artist.  I put in 40 hours a week in that job.  So I was homeless but I was working.  When the car was towed all my possesions were gone and all I had was my computer bag and the clothes I had on.  Furthermore I was in the hospital 60 miles away from where I worked and had no way to get to work even if I could.  I am not proud of my ebegging but I have been slowly paying people back every two weeks when I get a paycheck.  

Anyway here is a blooper reel of my video